No hudud please, kita kan orang malaysia.

Kenapa orang islam sibuk dengan hudud yang kerja nya nak potong tangan orang muslim? Kenapa nak laksanakan undang2 yang jelas tidak adil dan bersikap kejam neh? Kenapa? Ada sesiapa boleh jelaskan tak? 

Instead, what do we get? An offer of the hudud law and its grim serving of chopped-off Muslim hands and feet, and stoning to death! What kind of future is that?

“It’s okay to implement the hudud law because it doesn’t affect non-Muslims.” So it’s okay for Muslims to be brutalised?

See what happens when the first Muslim hand gets chopped off for stealing a motorbike.

What if a medical team is on standby to gather the chopped-off hand and the victim and run to Terengganu or fly to KL for the hand to be stitched back?

What if the thief was with a Chinese or Indian accomplice who was sentenced only to a few months’ imprisonment under the Penal Code while the Malay thief is now disabled and unable to get a job, and be forever publicly stigmatised?

Or really, could this be a conspiracy to make the Malays permanently physically disabled in order to justify affirmative action in perpetuity? I wonder.

“Non-Muslims should shut up because it doesn’t affect them.” But they are Malaysian citizens who have every right to speak up on laws that allow for brutal and inhumane punishments against their fellow citizens, the majority population to boot.

Who wants to live in such a society when your neighbour, your friend, or your fellow citizen are subject to a cruel legal system?

How could I live with my conscience if I were a Chinese who has witnessed a rape, but my infidel evidence would not be accepted under the hudud law? No, I cannot keep quiet and accept such a law.

“Muslims who are not experts on Islam should shut up”. Then please take religion out of the public sphere and make it private between us and God. But not when I can be flogged 80 lashes for qazaf (slanderous accusation) if I report I have been raped and am unable to produce four pious and just Muslim males who witnessed the rape.

On top of that, my rape report could also be taken as confession of illicit sex and I could be charged for zina. And even if I could produce the four men, I would be torn apart wondering why four supposedly pious and just men watched me being raped.

And God forbid if I was single and became pregnant because of the rape. I would be charged for zina and lashed 100 times because my pregnancy is regarded as

evidence of illicit sex.

The burden is on me, not the state, to prove I was indeed raped. The evidential requirements make this impossible. And the accused rapist will be free from any hudud punishment by simply denying the rape.

And we are all supposed to shut up? No wonder some of our political leaders are bent on their so-called “Islamic state” and “Islamic law” project because it is so easy to fly the flag of religion and silence dissenting voices.

Even of their political opponents – many of whom can only summon the courage to claim: “I am not against the Hudud law, but the time and conditions are not right to implement it.” There are hundreds of commands, exhortations, values and principles in the Quran that we ignore or violate on a daily basis.

The command for us to be kind and compassionate at all times, the duty of a man to provide and protect his wife and children, the obligation of a leader to be just and fair in his ruling are just a few of these.

And what does an Islamist party prioritise as the hallmark of its piousness? The Hudud law. Instead of having the political courage to say no to the Hudud law, once and for all on so many available grounds – Islamic, constitutional, human rights principles, lived realities – so many of their political opponents dither and hedge.

It is so tiresome that we the rakyat are subject to this again and again.

Sisters in Islam wrote letters to the editor, published a book and submitted a memorandum to the Government, all objecting to the PAS attempts to introduce the Hudud law in Kelantan and Terengganu in 1993 and 2002 respectively.

You could read the full article by click here.

First, please dont throw your anger to me because i am not the person whose wrote this article. This article written by zainah anwar which, she's one of the columnist for the star newspaper. 

Too many incorrect judgements made by this zainah's. Many misinterpretation. Who's zainah anwar anyway that we should care in this case? 

Lets look more deeper about her ;

1. Zainah anwar = member's of SIS.

2. SIS = sister in islam

3. SIS = linking to government and bersih

4. Dalam erti kata lain, SIS pandai cari tempat  bergantung. Dia tahu bahawa kepentingan menjalin "good relationship" between opposition and government akan memberikan dia kedudukan yang stable. Ini kemahiran mereka. 

Dalam ayat di atas kita boleh lihat bahawa zainah tidak faham bahawa ;

1. Zina bukan rogol. Kepentingan 4 witness only for zina case not for rape case. This matter dia tak faham sebab dia lacking dalam ilmu islam. It's okey. Bukan nak kutuk dia just nak remind dia bahawa rogol itu lain, zina itu lain. Takpe. Sesetengah muslim memang malas mencari ilmu islam.

2. From the title of the article pun dah showing dia punya mentaliti. No hudud please, we are malaysians. So what? Is a malaysian more powerful than a muslim? I am a muslim first not a malaysian first. You may disgrace my confession but do i care? 

Malaysia neh pun Allah swt yang cipta. So what? Adakah dulu2, Allah swt tidak tahu bahawa malaysia dan melayu neh bakal wujud? The thing's dia tak faham pun the differences between zina and rogol so macam mana dia nak faham pasal pelaksanaan hudud di malaysia neh? Sedangkan itu benda simple je. Hahaha.. funny gile.

3. Takpelah orang islam tak faham islam, kenalah kita rajin fahamkan. Tapi penyiaran artikel neh di star hanya menampakkan konon nya hudud itu kejam. Dan apa yang amat dikesali ia ditulis pula oleh orang yang mengakui dia islam. Paper neh readers dia mostly non-muslims [ i predict je]. So dari situ ia semacam percubaan untuk burukkan hudud supaya pembaca bukan islam melihat hudud neh mengacam orang islam dikala nik aziz berkali2 highlightkan no hudud for non-muslim.

4. Percubaan neh juga dilihat sedang menakut2kan umat islam. Hahahaha adoihaii. Kenapa perlu ada orang islam halang hudud, undang2 Allah swt neh? Penambahbaikan okey, tapi idea menjahanamkan dan menyerongkan fakta disokey. Apakah hukuman potong tangan boleh suka2 dilaksanakan? Ia memerlukan proses dan tingkat pengadilan yang berkali2 sebelum seseorang tue boleh dipotong tangan nya. Pencuri motorsikal yang mencuri motorsikal tidak akan dipotong tangan dia sewenang2nya.

Berapa kali mencuri, berapa lama mencuri, nilai kecurian, sebab mencuri, bukti bahawa dia mencuri, keinsafan sang pelaku, semua itu di ambilkira. Bukan first time mencuri terus kena potong tangan. Kalau dah kerja mencuri + menipu + merompak + sehingga menyebabkan kematian [tiada niat] + tiada keinsafan memang lah wajar dipotong tangan. Ini sebagai pengajaran. Tapi beberapa hal diambilkira sebelum hukuman potong tangan berlangsung.

Tiada sebab orang islam perlu takut kepada hudud unless dia ialah penjenayah. Selain dari itu, there's no reason why muslims have to reject hudud.

Sozcyili : Tidak percaya kepada pengadilan Allah swt ataupun tidak mempercayai Allah swt sebenarnya?